Inmate Magazine Service, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS,
Plaintiffs, Case no. 3:21-cv294-TKW-HTC
V.
INMATE MAGAZINE SERVICE, INC., a Wyoming corporation, 318 LLC, a Florida limited liability company, 318 LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company, INMATE MAGAZINE SERVICE of N.A. LLC, a Wyoming Limited liability company, INMATE MAGAZINES PLUS.COM of N.A., LLC, a Wyoming Limited liability company, and ROY SNOWDEN,
Defendants. /
RECEIVER'S INITIAL NOTICE TO CUSTOMERS OF INMATE MAGAZINE SERVICE, INC. AND INMATE MAGAZINES PLUS.COM OF N.A., LLC
On Monday, February 22, 2021, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and the State of Florida, Office of the Attorney General ("FLAG") filed a civil lawsuit against the following persons and entities:
In the lawsuit, the FTC alleged that the defendants operated their magazine sales businesses in violation of (i) Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §45(a), (ii) the FTC's Trade Regulation Rule Concerning the Sale of Mail, Internet or Telephone Order Merchandise, 16 CFR Part 435 ("MITOR"), and (iii) the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade practices Act, Fla. Stat. §§501.201 et seq ("FDUTPA"). Later the same day federal district judge T. Kent Wetherell entered an Ex Parte Temporary Restraining Order with Asset Freeze, Appointment of a Temporary Receiver, Immediate Access to Business Records, Limited Expedited Discovery and Other Equitable Relief, and Order to Show Cause why a Preliminary Injunction should not Issue (hereafter the “TRO”). Copies of the Complaint and TRO may be viewed at www.bernet-receiver.com. Among other things, the Court froze all of the Defendants' assets and enjoined the Defendants from:
In the TRO the Court also appointed Mark J. Bernet as the receiver for each of the five business organizations identified in the first paragraph above (collectively, the five business organizations are the "Receivership Entities"), as well as "any other entity that has conducted any business related to Defendants' marketing and sale of purported money-making opportunities to consumers, including [entities] that the Receiver determines is controlled or owned by any Defendant." The Court directed the Receiver, among other things, to "[a]ssume full control of [the] Receivership Entities," "[t]ake exclusive custody, control, and possession of all Assets and Documents" of the Receivership Entities, and "[s]uspend business operations of the Receivership Entities" if the Receivers believes the business cannot be continued "legally and profitably." The TRO since has been converted into a Preliminary Injunction containing the same substantive terms. Based on the provisions of the TRO and Preliminary Injunction, the Receiver has opted, for the time being, to suspend the business operations of the Receivership Entities while he evaluates the legality and viability of their business operations. Further details will be reported on the Receiver's website, www.bernet-receiver.com, as they become available.
|